The gist was meant to expose extreme liberals - not just people who hold liberal views on some things.

We have endlessly heard about the "far-right wing" which leads to militias and neo-nazis, I intended to show that there is a counterpart on the "far-left wing" side which evolves into the anarchist and the terrorist.

Lenin and Trotsky & co. believed anarchism was a legitimate tactic to achieve the socialist goals. Terror was employed in dynamiting leaders and politicians of the Tsar's government.

Alexander II was blown into pieces in his carriage, Stolypin was shot, and often all organized on campuses by groups of proud socialist anarchists.

The deluded Saudis who flew the planes into the towers screaming "god is great" (Allah Akbar!) truly believed they were the good guys!

Innocents are not innocents to the righteous. All are painted with the same brush.

Just as the Bush family is painted as corrupt elitists intent on setting up their global empire and kicking back with the power and the profits. If enough people post these things on websites and paint imaginary dots between events real or fabricated, there will be many who believe it.

The anarchist liberal can justify killing those who are "obviously evil". Lenin could order the execution of the Tsar and his family at Ekaterinburg without hesitation - the four daughters included. No heirs - less threat.

Some folks read these rantings and often bizarre fabrications about the Bush family on the web and then are caught with a handgun jumping over the White House fence to do away with the "evil monster."

All these folks feel righteous - they feel they have the white hat on.

My post was inflammatory, true, but after reading Weiner's article - I couldn't help but see him as a modern day Anarchist in training - rousing the loyal masses into a mob and hoping they will do his bidding and wholly accept his distorted view of the President and the world.

SDAI-Tech1