Re: MIT Tech Review

Off Topic » in reply to Re: MIT Tech Review

Re: MIT Tech Review

alcaray — 10/30/2002 7:13:28 PM (archived)

>>>Detroit will be motivated to do this when they can do it for a price people are willing to pay.

So the decrease in fuel economy is to bring the cost of cars lower?

The whole thread (16 posts)

2003 model cars show steady decline in fuel economy - Success_Machine - 10/30/2002 4:32:04 PM
- MIT Tech Review - p - 10/30/2002 5:24:13 PM
  - Re: MIT Tech Review - Tom Brosz - 10/30/2002 6:38:54 PM
    - Re: MIT Tech Review - alcaray - 10/30/2002 7:13:28 PM
      - Economy - Tom Brosz - 10/30/2002 7:44:52 PM
        
        Sometimes it's wise to use more than just your appetite to make your decisions. - alcaray - 10/30/2002 9:59:02 AM
        
        That's why they're called 'reactionaries' ;-) (n/t) (n/t) - Robert - 10/30/2002 2:28:07 PM
        
        Re: Sometimes it's wise - Tom Brosz - 10/30/2002 1:15:33 PM
        
        Re: Sometimes it's wise - SM - 11/1/2002 6:12:46 PM
    - Re: Iogen Inc. in Ottawa Canada produces net positive ethanol energy - Success_Machine - 10/30/2002 6:47:08 PM
      - Net positive ethanol energy - Tom Brosz - 10/30/2002 7:22:57 PM
        
        Re: If we confine the debate specifically to energy - SM - 10/30/2002 7:56:36 PM
    - Re: MIT Tech Review - Splinx - 10/30/2002 10:07:05 AM
      - Re: MIT Tech Review - SDG - 10/30/2002 12:22:09 PM
  - Re: Maybe fuel choice is more important than fuel economy - Success_Machine - 10/30/2002 6:10:23 PM
  - Detroit will become motivated to increase fuel economy when customers begin demanding it - Larry J - 10/30/2002 9:17:14 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Off Topic

The whole thread (16 posts)