Yeah, I made a pretty broad statement myself.

Off Topic » in reply to Re: You made a broad statement that was patently false, by any method of counting.

TB — 12/28/2011 1:55:06 AM (archived)

Let's see if you have the horsepower to actually refute it with some facts. The history and the numbers are out there.

Hint: Going into your standard Bush paternoster is not a counterargument.

You've not only made a dash for your comfort zone, you've slammed the door behind you.

The whole thread (16 posts)

Answers - johannes - 12/26/2011 10:38:14 PM
- Re: Answers - VelociraptorBlade - 12/27/2011 8:12:26 AM
  - Re: Answers - johannes - 12/27/2011 10:24:47 PM
- Re: Answers - bowser - 12/27/2011 3:45:40 AM
  - Re: Answers - johannes - 1/2/2012 4:32:15 AM
  - Re: Answers - TB - 12/27/2011 4:53:26 AM
    - Re: Answers - johannes - 12/27/2011 10:27:34 PM
    - Re: Answers - bowser - 12/27/2011 8:59:23 AM
      - Re: Answers - VelociraptorBlade - 12/28/2011 7:34:38 PM
      - One data point hardly makes your argument for you, particularly if you're tallying "carnage." - TB - 12/27/2011 5:10:39 PM
        
        Re: One data point hardly makes your argument for you, particularly if you're tallying "carnage." - bowser - 12/27/2011 7:23:58 PM
        
        You made a broad statement that was patently false, by any method of counting. - TB - 12/27/2011 7:38:36 PM
        
        Re: You made a broad statement that was patently false, by any method of counting. - bowser - 12/28/2011 1:22:23 AM
        
        Yeah, I made a pretty broad statement myself. - TB - 12/28/2011 1:55:06 AM
      - Re: Answers - ER - 12/27/2011 3:05:06 PM
        
        Re: Answers - bowser - 12/27/2011 6:56:29 PM

Recent posts

The whole thread (16 posts)

Related discussions