Let me be real open (probably uncomfortably so) about this.

Some women are not women.

Some men are not men.

Oh sure they may have the correct chromosome match up - but they are what we shall call reverse polarities.

What does this mean?

Glad you asked.

It means, in a nutshell, that the majority of their cosciousness as built up over many lifetimes of experience has a bias in reverse of their actual physical gender.

If someone lives a hundred lifetimes and 80 of those lifetimes they incarnate as a male - when they do incarnate as a female they will have decidedly male characteristics as well as very likely gender issues. Vice versa for a man with 80% female incarnations.

Most of the suffrage movement was composed by male polarity women. Same with the women's libbers of the early seventies.

Used to being male - they found the restrictions and societal functions of a woman distasteful to the extreme.

Ironically, these male polarities were often abusive to women or were the most restrictive when they were men. In a sense this is penance for them - but really is a lesson they needed to learn. After restricting women - they needed to incarnate as women and now have this strong drive to reverse some of their long-held biases.

When the truth of reverse ploarities is revealed from under the fog of a "one-shot" outlook suddenly the whole picture of planned parenthood and militant women in general who are disgusted by the whole concept of motherhood becomes painfully clear.

Here's an example scenario.

Scott Peterson (if guilty), and if found guilty of murder and executed might return as a woman. Having taken two lives he now has an extreme negative experience and actions to try and compensate for. The first and foremost opportunity to reverse some of this destructive act might come as incarnating as a woman and giving birth to either his former wife or her unborn child, or both. By giving them a doorway to enter the world he starts to compensate for his forcing their exit from the world.

Yes, I know what you're thinking. Yes, Scott, now as a very uncomfortable woman, will be debating abortion. His/her desire to terminate the pregnancy will be motivated by these past hates and experiences. But he (and those who help these severe cases) will make sure that he does not abort and thus will be born a severely dysfunctional family full of love/hate issues to work out. The kids will likely hate their parents and no one would understand why they all get along so awfully. Or, hopefully, it is possible that they are a very tightly knit family and work out these past hates and actions.

Women considering abortions have serious issues and past histories with their unborn children.

Yes, I know this sounds awful - but almost all abortions are often replays of past murders and hateful acts to others in past lives.

In some instances it is the baby that attracts an abortion. Again, we can use the tragic case of Scott - who might find himself incarnating as the future child of one of his now reincarnated victims. The mother, naturally, really dislikes the unborn child forming within her - even though she may not have any apparently rational reason for these feelings.

Scott then might very likely be aborted.

Truth is far stranger than fiction.

Indeed there are very likely many lives which preceded this current one and in which this trio have been negatively bonded together.

Ultimately one will see that no one is a true victim, but all of us receive feedback from past actions and experiences.

I don't see the unborn fetus as a victim, nor the mother contemplating abortion.

This gives me a very balanced view of abortion and a real compassion for the plight of all these souls involved in replaying or trying to balance these drastic and negative pasts.

In a perfect world - abortion would not need to occur. But we do not live in a perfect world and abortion becomes one of the many ways these pasts are worked out or often simply regenerated - causing further issues.

Yes, this is a very controversial view of this issue. It is bound to offend many who view each unborn child as a clean slate or who choke at the thought of abortion being a replay of a past murder. However, if souls were open books and one could see beyond the fog - all this tragedy becomes very clear and almost mathematical in its give and take.

Another issue for thought:

Imagine that there are some worlds which use abortion as population control - not just numbers - but actually to weed out the "undesirables" (like us earthers) who might perchance incarnate and be considered beneath the level they seek to inhabit their world.

In many ways we should be glad that souls still have privacy on earth and can work out their pasts without prejudice.

There are always both positive and negative sides to any issue or course of action. In my travels, I have found that those who understand this fact - often make bad choices - justifying them under this conceptual umbrella. In some ways I fear for earth when this truth becomes popularized and yet not fully understood.

Abortion or "population selection" as a form of creating an ideal society is one of these societal distortions. On earth in Sparta the deformed children were thrown off a cliff so that their society would not have to suffer their presence.

Naturally, the throwers of these children would find that they end up aborted in future lives and would hopefully quickly see the errors in their previous thinking.

No gods need to orchestrate this give and take of checks and balances - energy is very scientific. All energy always seeks equilibrium. No one ever has gotten away with anything bad. No good act has ever gone unrewarded.

We have the responsibility to learn and evolve. Our futures are made by the actions and thoughts we take today. Keeping this in the forefront of one's consciousness is a surefire way to catch one before one does something stupid or hurtful to others and is a way to help chart a more constructive destiny.

SDAI-Tech1