and they usually find ample supporting information.
1. Trade off - would your SPHC trade off be better or worse than a "slight" tax increase with a rebate applicable to a private carrier premium? (theory of competition)
2. SPHC in all major nations - They work but how well do they work and what would we have to give up that the people in those nations have never had. Surely we can find a way to require health care without the government being the provider.
3. Supplemental for the wealthy and semi-wealthy - I believe that a SPHC system with supplemental will eventually result in a longer life expectancy for the privileged and a declining life expectancy for the less privileged.
4. Medicare SPHC - not so, mine is with United Health Care, and there is BCBS, Humana ETAL. Not supplemental,just a zero additional premium plan paid by my part B premium, covering medical and prescriptions with reasonable co pay and max oop.
It is much better than SPHC Medicare that requires a supplemental prescription rider.
Flame » in reply to Re: How conservatives appeal to the middle class to work against itself.
Facts are immaterial, everyone believes what they want to believe
The whole thread (37 posts)
- How conservatives appeal to the middle class to work against itself.
- It’s the economy stupid
- Re: How conservatives appeal to the middle class to work against itself.
- Re: How conservatives appeal to the middle class to work against itself.
- Re: How conservatives appeal to the middle class to work against itself.
- Re: How conservatives appeal to the middle class to work against itself.
- Didn't shock me.
- Re: How conservatives appeal to the middle class to work against itself.
- Re: How conservatives appeal to the middle class to work against itself.
- Re: How conservatives appeal to the middle class to work against itself.
