I did. You asked for a link to my post, and I provided one with a trail to many more. You asked for more examples of Bush, conservatives and Hitler, and I provided a massive one.
As far as then following your questions all over the goddamned map, TB, that's your favorite trap. Divert, draw people down your trail, more questions, and pretty soon we're blaming Frank Church for the inability of the CIA to do anything right.
Nope, I owe you more info about Bush's attempt to take over the country absolutely and Ashcroft's sabotage of it even while very, very sick and pressured unmercifully by Bush operatives and that's it.
If you will go back and find 10 questions I've asked you and you've ignored, I'll reconsider. You won't, of course, so I can afford to sound generous.
Current Events » in reply to Re: How about a nice link to that "pledge" you seem so obsessed with?
Re: How about a nice link to that "pledge" you seem so obsessed with?
The whole thread (26 posts)
- For Robert
- I read that post
- Thanks bowser.
- Re: Thanks bowser.
- Wow, a self-referential rant. Brilliantly ironic to parody rightwing extremism and knee-jerk smears as a vehicle to claim that the left is smearing the right.
- Re: Wow, a self-referential rant. Brilliantly ironic to parody rightwing extremism and knee-jerk smears as a vehicle to claim that the left is smearing the right.
- That response wasn't even coherent.
- Re: Thanks bowser.
- Wow, a self-referential rant. Brilliantly ironic to parody rightwing extremism and knee-jerk smears as a vehicle to claim that the left is smearing the right.
- Re: Thanks bowser.