Rational Decision Making: Cost/Benefit Analysis

Space/Science » in reply to Scientific Proof Vs Rational Decision Making

E.P. Grondine — 7/5/2002 4:11:11 PM (archived)

The costs of reducing CO2 output are going to be STAGGERING.

That's why a firm understanding of the effects of the increase in CO2 is going to have to be in place before action is taken. Since climatic models are so weak, the prudent course of action based on current understanding is to increase that understanding, and then take action if necessary.

ep

The whole thread (13 posts)

New Computer Model Promises Detailed Picture of Worldwide Climate - gbaikie - 7/5/2002 10:58:31 AM
- That's nice. Now, they need to validate their model against the real world... - Larry J - 7/5/2002 4:45:38 PM
  - Re: That's nice. Now, they need to validate their model against the real world... - gbaikie - 7/5/2002 7:53:01 PM
  - Scientific Proof Vs Rational Decision Making - Mark Eby - 7/5/2002 2:38:58 PM
    - Give it up! - Bowser - 7/6/2002 7:14:42 PM
    - I don't doubt that global warming is real - Larry J - 7/6/2002 12:48:37 PM
      - You Didn't Answer The Questions - Mark Eby - 7/6/2002 3:09:59 PM
        
        Re: You Didn't Answer The Questions - Larry J - 7/6/2002 4:54:32 PM
    - Rational Decision Making: Cost/Benefit Analysis - E.P. Grondine - 7/5/2002 4:11:11 PM
      - BS - Mark Eby - 7/5/2002 4:29:49 PM
        
        Re: BS - E.P. Grondine - 7/7/2002 8:15:36 AM
        
        Fuel Efficiency A Prime Case - Mark Eby - 7/7/2002 9:48:06 AM
  - Re: That's nice. Now, they need to validate their model against the real world... - p - 7/5/2002 8:37:00 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (13 posts)