Space/Science » in reply to Re: Interesting photo

That question could be reversed.

Lee — 9/1/2002 1:31:52 PM (archived)

Why is it that a 15 mile ET spacecraft is automatically interpreted as a photographic flaw or digital artifact?

While I agree that most "ufo" cases can be resolved with conventional explanations, some can not (such as the 1952 D.C. flyovers, this photograph, and others). While this may in fact be distortion of some kind, to just automatically assume it is and forget about it isn't the right way to go.

O'Neill's cylinders would've been up to 20 miles long and 4 miles across.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (32 posts)

• Interesting photo of object near the Martian moonlet, Phobos. - Sigmond - 9/1/2002 5:17:26 PM
  • Obvious fraud: malfunctioning camera - Robert - 9/2/2002 6:44:33 PM
    • Not obvious at all. The case looks to be still open... - Jack Herer - 9/4/2002 6:34:21 PM
      • obvious - Tom Brosz - 9/4/2002 5:23:14 PM
      • Get real - Robert - 9/4/2002 2:16:14 PM
    • It's a anomaly. - Woodlock - 9/3/2002 3:19:57 PM
      • Re: It's a anomaly. - Robert - 9/3/2002 4:18:35 PM
        • I agree their not classified. - Woodlock - 9/3/2002 5:47:45 PM
          • Mites of truth - Robert - 9/4/2002 2:30:38 PM
    • Answer found, case closed. - Lee - 9/2/2002 3:00:16 PM
    • Nice work, Robert - Tom Brosz - 9/2/2002 1:16:19 PM
    • Hurray Robert... - SDAI-Tech1 - 9/2/2002 8:03:09 AM
      • Re: Hurray Robert... - Nick Hoffman - 9/3/2002 11:37:09 AM
      • Perpetrators and victims - Robert - 9/2/2002 8:10:34 AM
  • Re: Interesting photo of object near the Martian moonlet, Phobos. - brendan - 9/2/2002 9:03:58 AM
  • Re: Interesting photo - Tom Brosz - 9/1/2002 5:42:09 PM
    • Re: Interesting photo - Delbert - 9/1/2002 6:55:34 PM
      • That question could be reversed. - Lee - 9/1/2002 1:31:52 PM
        • Sure, but that doesn't mean anything. - Tom Brosz - 9/1/2002 2:47:31 PM
          • The conspiracy theory wasn't my idea. - Lee - 9/1/2002 4:08:22 PM
            • R"digital enhancer" ?? - Nick Hoffman - 9/3/2002 11:43:41 AM
              • Yes photo enhancment is used all the time. - Lee - 9/3/2002 3:05:54 PM
      • Re: Interesting photo - Sigmond - 9/1/2002 1:30:16 PM
        • You are officially another conspiracy nut then? - ebnelson - 9/2/2002 1:07:37 PM
        • Frontiersmen and women?? n/t (n/t) - O'Neil - 9/2/2002 9:25:27 AM
  • No one with credibility is saying that is a ship. - ebnelson - 9/1/2002 4:25:52 PM
  • You are getting on my bad side. - Justin Kelly - 9/1/2002 3:16:53 PM
    • Oh, Sigmond, in case you're wondering... - Tom Brosz - 9/1/2002 4:38:05 PM
      • I began wondering long ago and have formulated my own conclusions.... - Sigmond - 9/2/2002 12:32:33 PM
        • Re: I began wondering: You may be right but - Johannes - 9/2/2002 6:07:50 PM
        • Re: I began wondering long ago - Tom Brosz - 9/2/2002 1:06:34 PM
        • The religious dodge is silly - ebnelson - 9/2/2002 1:06:18 PM