Expanding Earth theory? Comment here is interesting:

http://www.dinox.freeserve.co.uk/english/comments.htm

Growth, Accumulation, Compression, Heating, Expansion, Relax by Mike Clark

"After 15 months of Studying Expanding Earth I am finally starting to make significant progress towards meaningful graphs of the Growth and Expansion of the Earth. My base rate of 0.4 mm increase in radius has not changed, but I am considering increasing my maximum rate of accumulation a very small amount. I originally started with 4.8 mm per year as the max and lowered it to 4.6 mm per year as the maximum. I now believe it is above 4.6 mm and below 4.8 mm per year. This cyclical rate gives me a total accumulation during the final Galactic rotation of 750 km (compressed from 790 km of accumulation)using a base time period of 230 MY for one Galactic Rotation. The period to rotate the Galaxy should be slightly longer each time (going backwards in time)but so far I am unable to find out how much longer. I therefor have been using uniform time periods of 230 MY or shorter to model growth. Growth is cyclical (pulsational) and begins and ends a cycle with 0.4 mm per year accumulation. (about 3 sheets of paper) The peak of the cycle that I have been using is assumed at 4.6 mm per year, but the sequence of the cycle has an increasing amplitude as you move forward in time, or decreasing as you move backwards in time. "

Clark goes on...but click on the url to read his math.

Seems like this subject is fair game for a space science bbs. Without any personal insults like the one started by Mark Eby in this thread, what does everyone here attribute to evolution favoring smaller animals, and as the author of the book Dinosaurs and the Expanding Earth points out, how were the dinosaurs able to attain such a large size and still be able to run and hunt?