Your logic consists of if no one else has a better explanation then yours must be right despite the fact it is full of wholes. That is psudoscience not science BD. You fall into in further when you support crackpot claims by Hoyle that are clearly contradicted by medical research simply because you prefer the implications of their work in support of your own crackpot theories. It is quite clear you can not tell the difference between science and psuedoscience.

I have often wondered why animals have tended towards smaller size since the dinosaurs time. This is a good question. I don't know the answer, but I can sure make a more rational guess than yours. Mini-blackwhoes evaporate quickly and conditions favoring their formation were only present early in the universe. If one somehow freqiushly formed more recently and was present inside the Earth it would consume the Earth and grow rapidly. A far more rational guess is simply that the climate at the time supported more rapid plant growth providing sufficient food for larger animals.

It is also telling that you feel so highly insulted by hearing the truth about the flaws in your theory. A real scientist would simply debate the technical details instead of whining about insults. You always make it personal when you have nothing logical to say in reply or try to change the subject. You did both above. Again most people here see right through you and I apologize for wasting board space on you.

Regards,
Mark