Now you've got me riled up because I agree with something Buchanan said. Funnily enough, I'm not used to that.
The neoconservative's (what the heck is one of them anyway?) plan would , IMHO, be a prelude to WW3.
(Why not have done with it, make it quick and just nuke everyone who we dont like?
All Arabia, N Korea, China, Russia, and what the heck, UK - they really pissed us off 200 years ago).
This "war" was never going to end with OBL and the Taliban. It's going to be a long dragged out affair.
Maybe even many of the groups the ncs dont like. Maybe we can also include certain memebers of the Israeli government too.
I find myself in complete agreement with Pat about the course that will end up with US+Israel v. Arabia. Europe and the rest of the world would drop out when they realized the thinly-veiled attack on Islamic nations in general.
Hopefully, the President will say "thank you, now let the adults work this out".
I am desperately not trying to think that the pro-Israel bias may be affecting Mr.Buchanan's thinking on this matter..........
Current Events » in reply to Since we're bringing up Buchanan...
Well Thank You Very Much Tom!
