Good Morning Mary Anne!

I will intersperse comments throughout...

Good morning, SDAI--



May I call you "S"?



Sure...'S' is fine. Acronyms are very flexible things.


A couple of years ago, a woman who belongs to the Unitarian church in the city wrote a letter to the editor criticizing the elderly for being old, in the way and generally a drag on the rest of us. She made exceptions for "exceptional people", that is, the elderly who didn't seem old to her, but rather, venerable. The noble elderly. As you might expect, the reaction in the letters column was extensive, offended and downright angry. I know this woman and wondered what she was up to, because it sounded atypical. She wrote back a week later and explained that she had a bet going with some of the people she has coffee with concerning the reaction if she submitted that letter, and she was happy to see that no one had disappointed her. She went on to say that it might be instructive if all of us looked at our other stereotypes with this memory fresh in our minds to see if the "defense of the elderly" episode would shed new light on other forms of bigotry based on physical appearance, ability, culture or income.

She is lucky she was not pelted bottles of Ben-gay and rapped with canes each time she stepped outside. My letters to the editor always required a full name - and then folks can hunt one down much more effectively;-)


It seems you got me. LOL! I should have known better.

Don't worry, my posts here have been generally straightforward - and these are serious times. As I mentioned this was not really for the board in toto - but was a button-pusher which I knew would bring feedback ;-) Normally I don't do such things...well actually sometimes I do.


I have been paying attention to your beliefs, and am still waiting to see whether you intend to apply explicitly the karmic justice theme of some of your other posts to the 6,000+ individuals in the WTC and the Pentagon. We disagree on (at least) one very important point: you don't believe in fundamental innocence and I do. I see an inherent danger in the idea that those who suffer as a result of injustice, cruelty or perversion have somehow done something in a past life to deserve it.

Well, here we can get into a lot of detail about energy and the way it functions. When I was younger I thought I was a saint - heck better than most saints! ;-) Only as I started to apply these energy principles to my own experiences did I see that there needed to pre-exist certain attitudes and actions which sponsored current events.

As you well know, history is not divisible.

All events come after previous ones and are intricately linked. In one perspective it is all just one big, infinite event.

(Here is where the meat comes in)
All actions and thoughts can be broken down into energy expressions.

All energy, all atoms, can be broken down into wave form motions. The fingers depressing the keys to make this post are superficially just nerve impulses triggering muscles and sponsored by synaptic firings of cells in the brain. However, if we look even closer, we will see that those synaptic firings originate in a web or matrix of wave forms we can call consciousness. These waveforms each have a specific shape, frequency and structure these wave forms assimilate all the physical data perceived:

Light wave forms which carry visual data

Sound wave forms which carry auditory data

Tactile waveforms which are carried by the nervous system

And lastly other waves and fields which exist outside these particular spectra and which would be classified as 'extrasensory' perception - even though it really is one of our fundamental senses. In this last category, the waves are received straight into the consciousness itself as they have compatible frequencies, shapes and harmonic attraction.

So now we have a jumble of waves and frequencies -all oscillating. To a radio these waves mean nothing. However to our consciousness they all have specific meanings and are classified and stored in compatible parts of this matrix.

The actions performed as a child do not disappear. The past does not disappear.

Here is a major concept...

The present IS the past.

It is only that these waveforms at any moment keep oscillating and so absorb countless new wave forms and adjustments - we call this change.

Well, change is not random.

All change occurring about you is very, very precise and scientific. These atoms all change their rate of vibration - due to their quantum wave interactions.

Our consciousness changes the same way. It evolves or devolves (depending upon its wave interaction) The education process can really be described as a simple wave exposure program.

Math, reading, history all these conceptual things exist with their own subset of infinite wave fields - which are imposed upon the young and old alike.

A just re-forming consciousness in this life is more receptive to learning these things - however it is not a blank slate.



A balnk slate would be incapable of assimilating data or information. These waves need COMPATIBLE harmonic structures to imprint upon.

That is why baboons do not discuss physics - because wave forms which comprise thoughts about physics are wholly incompatible.

When we really understand the way this works - we see that all people must be compatible with the things they learn and the events which occur to them.

Innocence is a very misleading word - as it presupposes there is guilt. Both these are temporary ways of interpreting events and actions by consciousness.

Eventually, consciousness evolves to the point where it realizes that all human actions are sponsored by these fundamental wavetrains.

A lion that kills a zebra is not judged innocent or guilty. A lion is a lion. It has a fundamental set of wave trains which trigger its actions. It survives by the law of the jungle - it kills. It kills without remorse, because it is hungry.

Humans which have a much more comprehensive set of wavetrains can evaluate all these extra things. The human can ponder the loss of the zebra to its family or the taking of a living things' life, etc. all can be evaluated when we act.

We consider other's feelings, social codes, hundreds of thousands of laws federal, state and local, and lastly our own past before we act.

The social misfit is one who does not take these things into account.

Humans as animals and all other energy is stratified.

Just like minerals, you find pockets of races, and even attitudes and behavior in various regions.

They are bound by harmonic principles of energy.

The forming fetus carries a set of fundamental wavetrains with it....just like old luggage.

A baby is not innocent or guilty. It is a being which has a current forming subset matrix of energy which is really sponsored by previously incurred data which is the greater matrix or 'super consciousness' if you will.

All physical actions are experiences are stored in this new matrix.

Yet when this child acts - it does not exclusively utilize these wavetrains - but these really also resonate with this greater field. The greater field has the sum of perhaps dozens or thousands of lifetimes experiences stored within it.

So all children are not created equal. The Jeffrey Dahmer's, Hitlers, Caligula's of the world are not the result of one lifetime of input - but are formed through a series of successive degenerative lifetimes.

A child can be born an apparent sadist to perfectly 'normal' parents, who has been educated in 'normal' schools. These actions are manifesting from past wavetrains which are so dominant that they immediately remanifest themselves in this 'new childs' consciosness. (Which again is really a sub-conscious set of data which absorbs and emits energy)

A child prodigy can be a master violist, pianist, nmathematician - and be born to parents who have never touched an instrument.

This again is a dominant wavetrain manifesting itself into the new child.

So yes, it IS easier for some kids to become good, bad, talented or what-have-you depending upon their past actions and lives.

No to these 6000 people. Each of them MUST have some sort of compatibility with what occurred.

This does not mean GUILT.

These means compatibility.

Some of these folks may have indeed blown up others in wartime. Others may have simply died many times in violent ways. Each will have an infinite number of reasons for having experienced this psychic shock. The fires may have been what attracted it to some....others being crushed...or crushing others.

The terrorist angle may have been what others were compatible with. There is literally an infinite number of reasons these folks may have needed to experience this tragedy to balance - or (this is important) give themselves the opportunity to overcome certain past distortions.

If I am hysterical before I am overcome with smoke and I die - I will have incurred such a psychic shock that I may become paranoid when someone just lights a cigarette or a match. So I may set up to overcome this fear of fire - by becoming a firefighter - or even helping to calm others who are fearful.

This takes those old, distorted wave forms and refroms them - that good ol' thing called 'change' again - and refashions them into more intelligent and balanced structures.

Balanced waves propagate more effectively and for longer duration.

If we wish to become more infinite in our behavior - we must become more balanced.

A car cannot drive and not crash unless many balances are maintained. The engine is balanced, the tires, the driveshaft, etc.

We are much like that car. We need to be balanced in our daily expressions and interactions.

Terrorists manifest great imbalance in their views. They will kill and be killed until they evolve into a more balanced state - or they will reach a point of imbalance which tears aprt their superconsciousness and the energy which they were is absorbed back into the infinite universe.

If they suffer because of their past behavior, then this is no more than justice, and those of us who witness it can feel free to be less constrained to stop the suffering or heal the resulting injuries.



No this is a misconception. Even the 'guilty' are deserving of compassion - again, because they are 'ignorant' of a more evolved manner of expression.

Besides, WE get a chance to prove OUR own BALANCE - by dealing with all folks in this manner - and not judge them by OUR OWN evolved standards.

This thought is fingernails scraped across my psychic chalkboard. It makes me want to put mittens on you and staple them to your wrists, but of course, you too have your First Amendment rights.

Yes, and I have made good use of them. I spoke out against the Catholic church and have worn the yellow shirt around the cities as a 'repenter' after have been tortured and taken before the Holy See.

In this particular lifetime my toes and fingers were cut off, before I finally recanted. In this present lifetime my teachers were frustrated when I had a tough time handwriting, tying shoes - or anything which required 'finger dexterity'.

However, I was not without guilt...as I had attracted this after having applied the 'eye for an eye' and cut of the hand of the thief...when I was a moslem</> some two hundred years earlier.

So my verbosity in this lifetime is immense ;-) It is not something one lifetime formed, as I have been orating and writing for many centuries now ;-)

I try to maintain balance - but sometimes my own pasts dominate my present and I go overboard or extreme.

As a librarian, and giver of knowledge...you may very well be balancing out your own pasts - when you may not have been as wise as you are now - and perhaps burned books or somesuch ;-)

Whatever we are MOST emotional about - you can bet we have perpetrated those same things. This is because as we have learned better, or evolved, this issue is still a sorespot - as remnant waves of past actions still need to be rectified or balanced out.

This concept is VERY unpopular. But it is tremendously helpful in ironing out imbalances - as it is hard to point hte finger and have three pointing back at you ;-)

Re: British caravans in 1931: A lot of colonized people shot at the colonizers. I recall a bunch of upstarts in North America in the 1770s. Today they would be characterized as terrorists in the British press, freedom fighters in the Patriot press, and ne'er-do-well embarrassments in the Tory press. Come to think of it, they were so characterized then too. The names have been changed, is all.

Fighting people who have taken or are trying to take possession of your country is one thing. Going to another country and killing people to get even, get the attention of their government, cripple their national spirit, or whatever, is very different.

Yes, each incident has its own set of values, judgements and biases. Offense one place is defense somewhere else.

Also (going back to the post that made me so mad I couldn't even formulate a response): the Huns have gotten a bad rap, as have other groups used to frighten children into good behavior. (The Iroquois served that purpose in my community, compounded,in my family, by the fact that they allied themselves with the English, who also wanted to kill us.) Sure they pillaged. Most armies do. Attila, to his credit, met with Pope Gregory the Great outside Rome. After that meeting, Attila spared the city. I was raised to believe that this happened because Gregory was a great leader. It only occurred to me much later that it happened because Attila was too.

I have a slightly different outlook - I see 'two birds of a feather' negotiating a deal to split the spoils between the two ;-)

History is a funny kind of mirror. We look in it and see ourselves in fancy dress.

I was a pumpkinhead this Hallowe'en. What kind of fancy dress had you? ;)

I was uncostumed - except perhaps as a doorman or perhaps a candy dispenser ;-)

Some folks here saw me dressed as an ass ;-)

Take care Mary Anne!

SDAI-Tech1

Regards--
Mary Anne