Re: Not necessarily

Current Events » in reply to Not necessarily

Re: Not necessarily

Tom Brosz — 12/5/2001 2:35:46 PM (archived)

It's also a lot easier to "infiltrate" an organization if you have no requirement to secretly and accurately transmit information back to your home base, which Walker did not have to do.

The whole thread (17 posts)

Makes me go Hm-m-m-m! - phil - 12/5/2001 12:04:45 PM
- Undercover Taliban - FrankC - 12/6/2001 3:42:34 PM
  - real undercover actions of the past - phil - 12/6/2001 4:44:09 PM
- Re: A kid would be a shoo-in, Phil . . . - D. Spires - 12/5/2001 3:45:32 PM
- Not necessarily - Larry J - 12/5/2001 1:40:27 PM
  - Do I remember something about infiltrating the Moonies? n/t (n/t) - alcaray - 12/6/2001 5:21:49 PM
  - 3 points - phil - 12/6/2001 1:55:35 PM
    - Re: 1 counter-point . . . - D. Spires - 12/6/2001 2:28:09 PM
      - Re: 1 counter-point . . . - Marcia - 12/7/2001 10:36:14 AM
      - cop out - phil - 12/6/2001 2:36:15 PM
        
        Re: cop out - alcaray - 12/6/2001 5:19:15 PM
        
        Re: cop out - phil - 12/6/2001 8:48:08 PM
        
        Sorry, I'm not "hearing" the silence you are describing. n/t (n/t) - alcaray - 12/6/2001 11:53:56 AM
        
        Then cite several examples...you cannot (n/t) (n/t) - phil - 12/7/2001 2:23:31 PM
        
        Re: Then cite several examples...you cannot (n/t) - alcaray - 12/7/2001 5:28:36 PM
        
        Re: Agreed, but it ain't gonna happen . . . (n/t) (n/t) - D. Spires - 12/6/2001 2:49:23 PM
  - Re: Not necessarily - Tom Brosz - 12/5/2001 2:35:46 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (17 posts)