<Okay, let's look at the problem without accusing anyone of being a raving lunatic.
;~)

If the source material is supplied by raving lunatics (tetrahedron.org), what choice is there?

Dr. Horowitz does make some legitimate assumptions that the companies involved stand to benefit from the anthrax mailings through vaccination and Cipro contracts.......he follows the "just follow the money line".
So Dan, (I understand mother always liked you best)....if the FBI is not planning on investigating anyone from Batelle, THEN WHO IS?

Local authorities have investigated the “verbal” threat at the Battelle Memorial Institute. No anthrax was ever sent or used at Battelle against anyone resultant from the threat. It is unrelated to the case of the anthrax mailings.

The problem with many is anthrax on the brain.

There was also no action taken from a quickly admitted prank at Washington Courthouse (that’s a small town just outside Columbus, where a teacher sent an envelope of talcum powder to the school principal. She immediately realized her error and notified both the principal and the authorities of what she had done. The principal and the teacher are actually good friends and it was simply a joke. Sometimes the best of us do something completely stupid, and there's only one way to correct it. You turn yourself in. The case was dismissed. Again, unrelated to the anthrax mailings.

You can follow the money all you want and hope and hope and hope that every company in the world is corrupt enough to make your theory stick, but when you come across the exception to your rule, why must you insist the company is corrupt regardless of the evidence -- or the lack thereof?

Over the weekend, I noticed a student pilot flew his plane into an office building in Florida. Funny how that wasn’t picked up as an “obvious” terrorist attack.

Chill,
Dan