Thanks for the response on Flame, Dan. I read it carefully, and sympathize with your frustration at moderating these boards. Rotten job, and someone has to do it.

Reading your post after the Flame post, I understand the below is considered an out of bounds response.

Bowser to Matt Burley –

“If you are going to post as much as you do, you might want to do a little background work on the issues.

“And, you might not.

“It's not possible to tell if you are reasonably bright, or dumb as a box of rocks. The ignorance overwhelms everything, so glaring as to make it impossible to see past it at what might, or might not, be operating.

“And, you, like eb, are welcome, don't bother thanking me. My little effort for the less advantaged. Compassionate liberalism at work. For you.

“Arf”

And this isn’t out of bounds.

Ebnelson to SDAI-Tech1

SDAI-Tech1, you as usual say with with and art
Just how phucking stupid Bowser really is.
Thanks
Ed

SDAI-Tech1, you as usual say with wit and art

The below is a matter of “style”.

Ebnelson post –

>"If we have to telegraph every God damned thing we do to the press.
All wars are cluster phucks.......we will instead be jacking off in this daisy chain of mutual blame and whining..I am disgusted."

And this isn’t an appropriate comment on the above.

Lindy response –

“Whew! All this at 7:30 am before you've even brushed your teeth??
No wonder your wife is dressed and out of the house already!”

OK. You got it!

Arf