There you go again,,,
EITHER OR!
Either moral or immoral.
If Phil made suffer-o-meters alongside his line of bogosity meters, and we took them to Iraq or Afghanistan to measure the collective suffering of the population, we would find that while the US actions cause short bursts of suffering, they are followed by longer stretches of non-suffering.
I have no doubt in my mind that by ousting Saddam collective suffering will decrease in and around Iraq.
One could make a good case that your efforts to pull down Bush and the war effort - you are actually promoting and advocating longterm collective suffering.
So who is moral and who is immoral?
Well if you read my poost about evil - you will know the answer to that one as well.
;-)
SDAI-Tech1