You're the one who keeps going on and on about the people's right to choose, and in the case of the pic, they did.

The wanted Reagan for a third, but couldn't have him, so they took the next best thing. The VP.

Clinton couldn't go a third, so the tried the next best thing. The VP.

Reagan won over, and is still winning today in the form of the his VP's son. It's already a dynasty.

I don't have a problem with it. Why do you? Why do you not trust the voters?

In the global arena, unlimited terms should be available. The photo you posted brings a level of fear to you, but there's no reason for it. The people spoke, and Gore was trumped -- and you can even thank al-Qai’da and Hussein -- maybe even Sharon and Arafat -- for another Bush victory in 2004.

But what about 2008? Will we then be secure -- or will there be newer, even stranger nasties out there that a new man in office could possibly ignore?

I don’t like seeing a job as merely started, then wondering, “Ah, if only...” I want to see the job finished.

Dan