I understand the limiting, Tom, but on the growing global scale, 2 terms may not be enough. What about increasing 1 term to 6 years instead of 4?
My firm disagreement is toward your assumption that Clinton could have taken the public a third time. He was barred from contact with Gore during the final months of the presidential campaign, simply because he was so disliked by that same voting public.
But, who knows. With the knowledge that he possibly could run for a third, fourth, fifth term, he might have tried a little harder, and been a better president...
We'll never know, because the frightened public would doubtless prefer your controlling democracy over my demanding democracy.
Well, the choice is still theirs*,
Dan
* the government
Current Events » in reply to Why do I not trust the voters?
Re: No . . .
The whole thread (18 posts)
- Bottom line question for the dems: Why do you support the changing of election laws when it is convenient for democrats? § (n/t)
- Re: Bottom line question for the repubs: When do you support the changing of the Constitution's Presidential term limit amendment?
- Legislation, not court decisions.
- Re: link correction
- Uh...because it works? (n/t) (n/t)
- Re: Bottom line question for the repubs: When do you support the changing of the Constitution's Presidential term limit amendment?
