Current Events » in reply to Bottom line question for the dems: Why do you support the changing of election laws when it is convenient for democrats? §

The whole thread (18 posts)

• Bottom line question for the dems: Why do you support the changing of election laws when it is convenient for democrats? § (n/t) - ebnelson - 10/1/2002 8:23:29 AM
  • Re: Bottom line question for the repubs: When do you support the changing of the Constitution's Presidential term limit amendment? - Mary Anne - 10/1/2002 1:29:18 PM
    • Legislation, not court decisions. - Tom Brosz - 10/1/2002 5:21:01 PM
      • Re: Legislation, not court decisions. - Mary Anne - 10/2/2002 12:15:59 PM
        • Re: Legislation, not court decisions. - Tom Brosz - 10/2/2002 4:59:31 PM
        • The issue isn't whether or not Toricelli can remove his name... - Scott - 10/2/2002 3:36:36 PM
        • Re: As small as the world has gotten over the past 40 years . . . - D. Spires - 10/2/2002 3:19:52 PM
          • I disagree. Term limits are like a forced change in Government - Scott - 10/2/2002 3:55:54 PM
            • Re: Oh . . . - D. Spires - 10/2/2002 4:41:17 PM
              • The voters aren't given unlimited choice as to who they can elect. - Scott - 10/2/2002 6:21:08 PM
                • Re: Okay -- but . . . - D. Spires - 10/2/2002 8:31:53 AM
                  • Term limits are a good idea. - Tom Brosz - 10/2/2002 11:15:14 AM
                    • Re: Get off it, Tom . . . - D. Spires - 10/2/2002 12:09:09 PM
                      • Why do I not trust the voters? - Tom Brosz - 10/2/2002 12:35:40 PM
                        • Re: No . . . - D. Spires - 10/3/2002 12:36:35 PM
        • MA, once again and slowly and respectfully: - ebnelson - 10/2/2002 12:42:59 PM
    • Re: link correction - Mary Anne - 10/1/2002 1:51:34 PM
  • Uh...because it works? (n/t) (n/t) - Tom Brosz (channeling a Democrat) - 10/1/2002 10:12:16 AM