Well, for starters the Bush Administration habit of holding citizens and non-citizens without charges for an indefinite period of time. At first Rumsfeld told us he wouldn’t lie, then said that was only for non-citizens, and now holds citizens. See “Padilla”. And Guantanamo. You can hold POWs according to international conventions, cannot hold people just because they happen to irritate you while defending their homelands.
To continue:
April 2001, the US was not re-elected to the UN Human Rights Commission, after years of withholding dues to the UN (including current dues of $244 million)-and after having forced the UN to lower its share of the UN budget from 25 to 22 percent. (In the Human Rights Commission, the US stood virtually alone in opposing resolutions supporting lower-cost access to HIV/AIDS drugs, acknowledging a basic human right to adequate food, and calling for a moratorium on the death penalty.)
(Opposes lower-cost access to HIV/AIDS drugs, acknowledging a basic right to adequate food!!)
International Criminal Court (ICC) Treaty, to be set up in The Hague to try political leaders and military personnel charged with war crimes and crimes against humanity. Signed in Rome in July 1998, the Treaty was approved by 120 countries, with 7 opposed (including the US). In October 2001 Great Britain became the 42nd nation to sign. In December 2001 the US Senate again added an amendment to a military appropriations bill that would keep US military personnel from obeying the jurisdiction of the proposed ICC.
(The US doesn’t want it’s war crimes exposed as war crimes, as opposed to 120 other, supposedly lesser nations.)
In May 2001, refused to meet with European Union nations to discuss, even at lower levels of government, economic espionage and electronic surveillance of phone calls, e-mail, and faxes (the US "Echelon" program).
September 2001: withdrew from International Conference on Racism, bringing together 163 countries in Durban, South Africa.
(Didn’t like what they were saying about racism.)
Optional Protocol, 1989, to the UN's International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, aimed at abolition of the death penalty and containing a provision banning the execution of those under 18. The US has neither signed nor ratified and specifically exempts itself from the latter provision, making it one of five countries that still execute juveniles (with Saudi Arabia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Iran, Nigeria). China abolished the practice in 1997, Pakistan in 2000.
1979 UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. The only countries that have signed but not ratified are the US, Afghanistan, Sao Tome and Principe.
The US has signed but not ratified the 1989 UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, which protects the economic and social rights of children. The only other country not to ratify is Somalia, which has no functioning government.
And on and on and on.
1972 Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention ratified by 144 nations including the United States. In July 2001 the US walked out of a London conference to discuss a 1994 protocol designed to strengthen the Convention by providing for on-site inspections. At Geneva in November 2001, US Undersecretary of State John Bolton stated that "the protocol is dead," at the same time accusing Iraq, Iran, North Korea, Libya, Sudan, and Syria of violating the Convention but offering no specific allegations or supporting evidence.
And yet hammers Iraq for having the stuff the US gave 'em.
Hypocrisy "R" US.
Arf
Current Events » in reply to Human rights
In case you're not joking.
The whole thread (25 posts)
- Norwegian Nobel Committee losses all credibility in its disgraceful decision to play politics with the Nobel Peace Prize
- This insight from the culture that gave us the word "Quisling"
- Re: Carter
- Just wondering when the Noble Prize Committee moved from Stokholm?
- Re: Norwegian Nobel Committee loses all credibility
- Congratulations to President Carter
- Re: But we won't know until the results are in . . .
