You didn't answer any of the many question I asked:

Can you possibly justify moving attendees at a photo-op who are holding critical signs 200 yards away into a fenced pen, in the name of "security"; while allowing pro-Bush attendees to decorate the photo op with smiling faces and messages of support? How is this not a blatant violation of the First Amendment?



What does it have to do with security? Would a potential assassin signal his intentions by holding a sign that would get him removed from the view of the cameras and proximity to his victim?



I just don't care whether you can blame Hillary Clinton for damn near anything including El Nino--that's a tired old rant. Nor does the vague assertion that "it's been done in the past" move me. That can't make it right--I think it's wrong...period.

But what do you think, Tom? Does your concern for the Bill of Rights disappear when it's a Rightist President attacking it?

--Robert