Current Events — HabitableZone

Current Events » in reply to Preemptive attack threatened

Comparing apples and oranges

Let's reread this quote:

Japan has warned it would launch a pre-emptive military action against North Korea if it had firm evidence Pyongyang was planning a missile attack. Defence Minister Shigeru Ishiba said it would be "a self-defence measure" if North Korea was going to "resort to arms against Japan".

What does this have to do with Bush's intention to attack Iraq?

Who would disagree with this statement?:

America has warned it would launch a pre-emptive military action against Iraq if it had firm evidence Baghdad was planning a missile attack. Defence Minister Donald Rumsfield said it would be "a self-defence measure" if Iraq was going to "resort to arms against America".

I wouldn't disagree--that's a "well duh!" statement. Self-defense is not controversial. Launching a preemptive attack without firm evidence of an impending attack is very controversial.

--Robert

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (21 posts)