Well, here's an article.
The marchers are against further violence or death but most are also firmly against the Iraqi dictator, who they realise is both violent and murderous. In most western countries, opinion polls show clearly that a majority would accept a war if it were authorised by the UN. Most marchers want Mr Hussein to give up his deadliest weapons, to abide by the 17 UN resolutions passed on Iraq since 1991, and to stop terrorising the 22m Iraqi people. If anything, they are even keener on “regime change” than the British and American governments, which for years have blown hot and cold over whether that is their aim. This makes these marches very different from those in the 1960s and early 1970s against the Vietnam war, when many protesters felt strong sympathy with the North Vietnamese and their leader, Ho Chi Minh.
Raoul
Current Events » in reply to Antiwar or anti-America?
Re: Antiwar or anti-America?
The whole thread (37 posts)
- Antiwar or anti-America?
- Let's see what Theodore Roosevelt has to say on this matter.
- " It's obvious to anyone who is being at all objective about it t"
- There you have it Tom - in a nutshell
- Re: Antiwar or anti-America?
- Lessee.
- Re: Antiwar or anti-America?
- Re: Antiwar or anti-America?
