Traditional ammunitions would have caused far more casualties. Iraq is obviuously interested in publicizing civilian casualties yet reports relatively light numbers despite as you say thousands and thousands of bombs. As others have noted we should expect some casualties near military targets. Have we seen these reported? Not any that I have heard. It is clear our weapons do have unbelievable accuracy despite Iraq and the anti-war crowds desires for high casualties numbers to support them.

While it is quite reasonable to assume some casualties are our fault it is also strange that those casualties are not where they would be most likely. Try applying the laws of probability to your own stance. Iraqi anti-aircraft artillary must also land somewhere. I think it is entirely reasonable to wonder which side is responsible and unreasonable to state categorically that either side MUST be responsible.

Regards,
Mark