Those might be interesting questions to get answered but who will ask them? As the news of torture chambers, organized rape, and summary executions comes out in the days to come, it'll be interesting to find out if the news agencies were covering up atrocities in order to maintain their coveted "access".
One of the first things you have to do to address any problem is to acknowledge it exists. If the news agencies covered up news of atrocities, especially for crass business purposes like maintaining access to a dictator's government, then they in effect were accomplices. Failure to report a crime can itself be a crime if you have knowledge of it. The writer admits to having advanced knowledge of 2 murders and did nothing to stop it.
Current Events » in reply to and CNN lied denying the accusations
What did they know and when did they know it?
The whole thread (37 posts)
- Media confesses it covered up Saddam's evil
- The New Republic published an article on this topic last October
- It's not just the media...
- Good stuff here.
- JHC! what good is access?
- Seems to me...
- And where has the information we have had about Iraq come from?
- I have my problems with FOX
- But buy staying, they gave Sadam legitimacy he did not deserve.
- Well now we know why the media is Bush's lap dog...
- Making Something Simple Complex
