"Changing regimes was always given high visibilty as a secondary but very important goal."
But, Mark, Even this was predicated, at home and in front of the world, on THIS regime being a clear and immediate danger to america and our allies VIA the mountains of WMD and teeming armies of Al-Qaeda militants. Regime change, unilaterally upon our will, is not a justification for war- at least not as long as we wish to think of ourselves as "good guys".
So you should think it through before you accuse me of dishonesty.
Also, I like your little dance. I expose hypocracy here and the first thing you do is slander... Your average Clintonian boogey-man would be proud....
Davin L.
Current Events » in reply to Play A Little Less Fast & Loose With The Facts
Around in the spin cycle: now I'm dishonest, eh?!
