"By that kind of logic, Rob, the whole world, including US Republicans, should be going full-bore to try to prevent global warming. The evidence is a lot more persuasive for GW then GW's evidence was for WMD - and the possible consequences a lot more severe."
Ok, so the US is going "full bore", should we nuke the countries which are not- that would be the absolutely quickiest way:) But I think improve relations, trade and helping these countries develop more efficent systems of producing energy would be better way of doing this. Signing some treaty wasn't a solution- the treaty did not address problem and was merely a tool to destroy the US economy. Just because Bush allowed the treaty to be voted down by submitting to the Senate (95 Senators voted against it- which btw includes lots of Dems) does not mean the US and the Bush adminstration is not spending a lot money studying GW and trying to develop an solution to this potential problem. Meanwhile those who have signed this treaty aren't doing as much to study problem or take steps to reduce their CO2.
Current Events » in reply to Re: Spam?!?
Re: Spam?!? No, it's a scam
The whole thread (35 posts)
- BBC: Failure to find Iraqi arms 'surprising'
- Re:search for BBC news
- RI guess ignoring the finds of the bioweapon labs will be now be rationalized.
- Don, this is becoming spam. Please avoid this topic unless you have something NEW to say.
- Re: I disagree.
- Spam?!?
- Re: Spam?!?
- Re: Spam?!?
- Re: Spam?!?
- Keep on keepin' on, Don n/t (n/t)
- You go, Don!
- nope
- Re: BBC: Failure to find Iraqi arms 'not' surprising . . .
