Your predictablility betrays you.
YOU are the one misquoting valid sources and slelectively posting rants to hide behind.
And you don't have the integrity to stand up and deal with it.
You failed in the predictions of a poorly run war, you failed in the predictions of high body counts, you failed in predicting a long, drawn out bumbling war against saddam, you failed in building up the claims of looting in the museum in Baghdad into a general breakdown of US leadership, and you fail still to credibly express any integrity on the issues.
Instead you hide behind your facade of self-proclaimed superiority, not realizing that people see right through it,and the empty arguments you spam here and elsewhere constantly.
Keep on swingin'.
Ed
Current Events » in reply to Let's take these one at a time
Don, when challenged you always fall into either 'get mental help', or 'you are too stupid to appreciate my brilliance"
The whole thread (24 posts)
- WMD Crediibility Editorials
- Notice the CYA maneuvers again...
- Digging Up The Dirt
- Until you address the failed credibility of your other claims
- What other claims?
- Looting, Quagmire, Saddam doesn't matter, economy started sinking under Bush, etc.
- What other claims?
- Rumsfeld on March 30, 2003 - GWB on WMD on February 8, 2003
