That is quite obvious.

I am not wild about MS habs and have never been an enthusiastic promoter of them. I have simply pointed out your grossly inaccurate statements regarding them and your steadfast refusal to review data on them contrary to you opinion. They are a relatively (compared to NASA) cheap sim designed to make some small steps towards exploration of Mars out of limited funds and they look like it. Doesn't mean some useful information can't be gained from them.

People with far more scientific credentials than you or Don are willing to give valuable time and effort to the MS habs. Since none of your tax money goes to it I don't see that your opinion is relevant at all. It seems far more likely that you simply see this as a weak point in the Mars Society agenda and attack it as a way to discredit a group that has done a good job of debunking your bogus claims.

Along those lines, your focus on what I have little interest in as opposed to detailed comments on an area I know and care far more about (MSR) is typical of your pseudoscientist tactic of avoiding technical debate with anyone knowledgeable enough to expose your ignorance.

Your plywood comments are grossly misleading and you know it. The fact that you continue to label these structures as if they were composed mostly of plywood is yet another example of your inate dishonesty.

Since you chose to ignore my advice and continue your usual unscientific drivel and misinformation, I will go back to ignoring you since few rational people believe anything you have to say.

If you wish to reconsider and get technical

Meteorite Mediated Panspermia
Review of The Back Contamination Issue
Your Panspermia Contradictions

Regards,
Mark