You keep trying to fall back on dodges like "nobody in charge has made this claim". But that's not what I said, and I called you on it the first time. Bush's speechwriters have standardized on a cheap (but very effective) rhetorical trick involving juxtaposition of Iraq and 9/11 to deliberately communicate that claim while providing a tiny figleaf of deniability that partisans like you can use to try and deny that they actually said it.
I couldn't locate the recent MSNBC article that provided a lot of examples. But when I went to whitehouse.gov and looked through a few of Bush's speeches, I was struck right away by the metronomic quality of the trick: "Iraq...9/11... Iraq...9/11... Iraq...9/11... Iraq...9/11... Iraq...9/11... Iraq...9/11... Iraq...9/11... " ad nauseum in damn near every statement he's ever made on the subject of Iraq.
This is not an accident. The use of repetition is a well-known rhetorical device to induce an almost hypnotic state of uncritical acceptance in the victims in which the desired linkage slips below their critical faculties.
And you know that.
Current Events » in reply to re: What were you expecting?
Better than what I'm getting
