The opinion comments on Blair had nothing to back them up and most of the story was on his wife. If this is your standard of evidence I don't think you have a leg to stand on when it comes to bashing missing WMD. Bush had far more evidence for that. I think this comment:

"The current complaint is that Bush is a deceiver, misleading the country into a war, after which there turned out to be no weapons of mass destruction. But it is hard to credit the deception charge when every intelligence agency on the planet thought Iraq had these weapons and, indeed, when the weapons there still remain unaccounted for. Moreover, this is a post-facto rationale. Sure, the aftermath of the Iraq war has made it easier to frontally attack Bush. But the loathing long predates it. It started in Florida and has been deepening ever since Bush seized the post-9/11 moment to change the direction of the country and make himself a President of note."

from here describes you to a tee.

Regards,
Mark