Where did I say the words in your first block quote
"A person who thinks taxes ought to be lower and government smaller,...", etc?
Did one of us make a typo, or are you just making things up now? I never said that. It makes no sense, anyway.
We all pay whatever taxes are required by our government according to the laws that are set up by our government. The law is set by our elected legislatures and constitutionally authorized. It makes no difference whether we are rich or poor, liberal or conservative. Why should liberals have to follow different rules? Whether or not those laws are fair can be debated, but they must still be followed or you risk going to prison.
NO ONE thinks taxes should be higher, or government bigger. That's what you accuse people of believing when they don't agree with you.
Taxes and government need to be as big as necessary to meet the needs of the nation, and no bigger. No doubt there may be disagreement on how much or how big, and that must be settled by debate and negotiation, aka politics, but you simply can't continue accusing everyone who doesn't swallow your crap uncritically of being a hypocrite, a Statist, or a Stalinist.
That's the kind of debating tactics you'd expect from a fascist, and I'll be frank with you, I'm sick and tired of them, and of you.
I don't rant because of your politics, I get pissed off because you are supercilious, condescending, patronizing and arrogant. You sound like Ted Cruz looks.
Current Events » in reply to Again...
Who's the hypocrite now?
The whole thread (33 posts)
- The Great Utah box canyon bushwack.
- Entertaining.
- Careful with the theories.
- "And ask yourself this: If there’s nothing damaging in his returns, Romney could now, in one stroke, annihilate Harry Reid’s reputation in Washington. So why hasn’t he released them?"
- Sigh. Gee I wish there was something Romney could do to end this entire issue???
- Meanwhile...
