I don't know where you get the idea that I consider the New York Times a bad news source. A biased one, to be sure, but I have linked far more times to the NYT than I have to Worldnet Daily. As for editorials, sometimes I agree, sometimes I don't.

The editorial staff gets points for admitting they thought there were large stockpiles of weapons there too, instead of going the route many have of pretending "they knew it all the time." Personally, I still think we have a lot to find yet.

My comments in my first reply say what needed to be said. There was a deadly risk to erring in the "Saddam may not have weapons" direction, too, and this is rarely recognized.