According to that list you linked to, UNSCOM took care of it...
... prior to 1998 [the date of the document is at the bottom]
All you've 'proven' is a condition that was already three years old when Bush took office, and has no bearing on the present absence of evidence.
After all Saddam was bad but Bush is far worse than Hitler and engaged in more conspiracies than one hardworking conspiracy site can keep track of! Got it. But you better tell it to the sacred cow folks who can follow such logic much better than I.
I don't know where that came from... the mirror, perhaps? ;-) From a lot of the rhetoric flying around here, it appears the most Sacred of Cows is a Texas Longhorn.
Current Events » in reply to Right...and you, Don, and others here wish THIS away:
Don't have to
The whole thread (32 posts)
- TIME: Where Are Saddam's WMD?
- 66,300 google hits on Kennedy assassination
- Meanwhile: CIA seeks probe of White House
- the story of the year
- Parents of GI casualties in Iraq protest Bush
- Moveon.org
- The thing I have learned from all this...
- "They [the Bush admin.] have failed all of us." - That's the understatement of the century and bound for the history books. (n/t)
