Every post on casualties you make reeks with the assumption that military casualties are the primary criteria on whether or not a military effort is succeeding. I have no idea where our country, or any free country would be if one, ten, or a hundred casualties was considered reasonable cause for surrender.

And "bringing our troops home" would be a surrender. You know it, and so do those carrying those signs.* But in their view, turning over 20 million people to monsters would be a small price to pay for destroying Bush and raising the Left to power again. It's not like it would be the first time.

*excepting those poor useful idiots who do fine in interviews until they are forced to engage in abstract reasoning.