Boy! Talk about mixing apples and oranges. I see you're grasping for straws here.

Clinton was found guilty of perjuring himself about an extra-marital affair. He was sanctioned by the court for doing so. The punishment meted was appropriate to the crime.

As for other accusations - he was exonerated of them. After spending $70 million trying to dig something up, prosecutors found nothing to warrant a criminal indictment. And, its been nearly three years since so-called "Pardongate." That "investigation" has produced nothing.

Rush Limbaugh, on the other hand, is an admitted drug addict who conspired to illegally launder cash to illegally acquire his stash of pills. What makes him a hypocrit is that at the same time he was illegally buying and using these drugs he was demonizing other drug abusers on his radio talk show and decrying so-called "liberal" chemical dependency treatment programs.

What makes you a hypocrit is your apparent willingness to look the other way for Mr. Limbaugh, but then make unsubstantiated claims and accusations about Mr. Clinton.