clinton was exonerrated of basically zip.
There were decisions to not prosecute. That is very different from exonneration.
And the many others in his administration, including gore's illegal fund raising, you specifically were on record saying that nothing counted since there were no convicitons.
And here you go, extrapolating from admitted drug abuse to conviction of money laundering.
All of this without even an indictment.
But you are not a hypocrite....lol@u.
And I have been on record here and elsewhere calling his addiction for what it is, and saying plainly that he may well face the end of his career and prison time for what he has done.
What I do find deliciously ironic is that a stoned drug addict Rush Limbaugh has been able to show the lies of the left precisely for what they are for many years, and is doing so even after being shown to be all too human in his weaknesses.
Ed
Current Events » in reply to Huh?!?
Dodge and weave, Don