Current Events — HabitableZone

Current Events » in reply to You simply don't get it

No, Don. You're flat out wrong.

Here's a good summary from Andrew Sullivan:

BUSH 1, KRISTOL/KRUGMAN 0: What a relief to hear the president forthrightly defend his decision to bar Germany, France and Russia from competing on Iraq reconstruction contracts. There is a difference between being magnanimous and being a patsy. Germany, France and Russia are completely free to donate money and troops to help Iraq's transition away from a dictatorship they defended and bankrolled. (They have, of course, delivered nothing.) But, after doing everything they could to undermine the U.S. at the U.N. and elsewhere in order to protect their own favored dictator, they have absolutely no claim on the tax-payers of the United States. The idea that we should reward them for their obstructionism out of our own coffers on the same terms that we are rewarding countries that gave money and lives to help the liberation is a preposterous one. It's tantamount to inviting exactly the same kind of intransigence and betrayal in the future. France in particular went much further earlier this year and last than simply opposing the U.S. on Iraq. The French government did all it could to rally world opinion, lobby foreign governments, and delay the war to Saddam's benefit in order to isolate and humiliate the U.S. They didn't just object; they opposed, plotted and lied to our faces. Forgetting this is absurd. Rewarding it is obscene. The president is right. Let the real allies of the U.S. benefit from the alliance. Let France, Germany and Russia live with the consequences of their own moral bankruptcy and strategic error. The alliance is indeed not what it was. Nor can it be. And the responsibility lies squarely in Paris, Berlin and Moscow.

There's absolutely nothing stopping France, Germany, Russia, etc. from kicking in to help establish a representative government in Iraq. They've done less than nothing, they went out of their way to help keep Saddam in power. For that, we don't owe them a damned cent from the US treasury. It's beyond arrogant for them to demand being allowed to win contracts paid for by US taxpayers after what they did. If they want to help, let them donate to the cause. The money they donate could go to contractors from their countries if they wish. But they can kiss my ass when it comes to demanding we reward them with contracts after the way they behaved.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (17 posts)