when it's a rant?
enthusiastic haste of the media to dump this story is astonishing,
I'm sorry, but I can't let the rampant double standards go by. The issue isn't Kerry, or any mythical affair. The issue is how the mainstream media deflects things for the Democratic frontrunner while chasing down every aspect of anything at all that might hurt Bush. Most of the mainstream media is in the pocket of the Democratic Party, and they aren't even trying to fake it any more.
Can you honestly say that if the exact same thin "intern" evidence had come up with Bush as the target, that the media would have spiked it like they did the Kerry story? Or would every goddam reporter at press conferences be asking Bush about it, and hundreds of reporters be camped out in Kenya?
My apologies if I misconstrued the terms "spiked by the media".
Got an answer yet for that last question you typed?
Oh, sorry, I forgot - they're just waiting...........
Current Events » in reply to If you were paying attention...
When is a rail not a rail?
