Space/Science » in reply to That's "amateurs" in the original sense of the word

The whole thread (20 posts)

• is there an astronomer in the house? - R.L. - 3/26/2004 7:38:31 PM
  • re: is there an astronomer in the house? - REB - 3/30/2004 3:45:00 PM
  • as close as I can get .. - Daniel - 3/27/2004 9:43:58 AM
    • re: as close as I can get .. - Bowser - 3/27/2004 6:43:42 PM
      • why ..? - Daniel - 3/28/2004 3:38:00 PM
        • Couple of reasons. - Bowser - 3/28/2004 7:52:31 PM
          • re: Couple of reasons. - daniel - 3/29/2004 2:05:28 AM
            • Not to be discouraged. - Bowser - 3/29/2004 3:31:06 PM
              • yup .. - Daniel - 3/30/2004 1:09:00 AM
  • Just a bunch of amateurs, it seems ;-) (n/t) - Fox - 3/27/2004 3:31:45 AM
    • That's "amateurs" in the original sense of the word - Tom Brosz - 3/27/2004 5:24:27 PM
      • "amateur" astronomy - Daniel - 3/28/2004 4:23:44 PM
        • Room for amatuers- I agree but let me add - R.L. - 3/28/2004 8:46:22 PM
          • re: Room for amatuers- I agree but let me add - Daniel - 3/29/2004 2:13:03 AM
      • preeeeeecisely (n/t) - Fox - 3/28/2004 5:27:13 AM
    • re: Just a bunch of amateurs, it seems ;-) - Raoul - 3/27/2004 11:18:34 AM
      • I was just curious and wanted some feedback - r.l. - 3/27/2004 12:41:08 PM
        • re: feedback - Fox - 3/28/2004 5:36:14 AM
        • re: feedback - Raoul - 3/27/2004 3:01:12 PM
  • re: I had the same question, apparently not. - Success_Machine - 3/26/2004 8:30:49 PM