re: "We were not going to wait for him to become a danger"

Current Events » in reply to re: "We were not going to wait for him to become a danger"

re: "We were not going to wait for him to become a danger"

REB — 6/25/2004 7:47:30 PM (archived)

Many have criticized President Bush for not preventing 9/11. How could he have done that? By attacking Afghanistan. Had he done so, I would imagine we be seeing post like this one you posted.

Saddam was a danger. He wanted WMD, he had WMD and he used WMD to kill.
Saddam invaded his neighbors. Those he didnâ€™t invaded he threatened and intimidated with his scuds and WMD.

The whole thread (30 posts)

More WMD evidence in Iraq - REB - 6/25/2004 11:38:19 AM
- More evidence for the lefty extremists to rationalize away - ebnelson - 6/26/2004 3:19:00 AM
- Didn't we sell him the sarin in the first place? (n/t) - Lindy - 6/25/2004 3:12:38 PM
  - NO! The USA has never sold Sarin to ANYBODY. - David F Mayer - 6/25/2004 11:02:27 PM
  - He told the UN he got rid of the stuff. - REB - 6/25/2004 3:35:49 PM
    - re: And he verified himself? - Raoul - 6/25/2004 4:09:31 PM
      - He made the stuff. He should know where they are. Another good reason to kick him out of power - REB - 6/25/2004 4:19:38 PM
        
        re: Not all countries are as well organized as the US - Raoul - 6/25/2004 4:26:53 PM
        
        So I take from your answer you would not like it if the US lost some of her Nukes. - REB - 6/25/2004 4:38:57 PM
        
        re: Hypocrisy - Raoul - 6/25/2004 5:35:22 PM
        
        Saddam was the worst. He used WMD to murder. - REB - 6/25/2004 5:45:37 PM
- Give it up. You'll have better luck bringing back the dead. (n/t) - Tammy - 6/25/2004 1:25:28 PM
  - Many would like that. They don't want any more evidence to be found. - REB - 6/25/2004 3:02:23 PM
    - Well, if there were TONS of all of this......... - Lindy - 6/25/2004 3:22:32 PM
      - We have found some. Now it has to be Tons? - REB - 6/25/2004 3:40:36 PM
        
        He lied, he lied, he lied...... - Lindy - 6/25/2004 4:37:04 PM
        
        re: YES! YES! YES! - Raoul - 6/25/2004 4:15:23 PM
        
        LOL - ebnelson - 6/26/2004 6:54:43 PM
        
        re: YES! YES! YES! - REB - 6/25/2004 4:24:16 PM
        
        re: re:The UN contained Iraq after GW1 (n/t) - Raoul - 6/25/2004 4:29:21 PM
        
        That's a laugh! - Larry J - 6/25/2004 5:28:09 PM
        
        UN, Oil for Food, Saddam. Need I say more about the UN containing Iraq? - REB - 6/25/2004 4:41:10 PM
        
        re: At this point, NOTHING that has been found in Iraq can JUSTIFY Iraq being invaded under the pretext of it being a threat to the world. (n/t) - Raoul - 6/25/2004 5:40:12 PM
        
        Nice switching of topics. Donâ€™t want to talk about UN and Oil for Food? - REB - 6/25/2004 5:49:04 PM
        
        re: "We were not going to wait for him to become a danger" - Raoul - 6/25/2004 7:27:34 PM
        
        re: "We were not going to wait for him to become a danger" - REB - 6/25/2004 7:47:30 PM
        
        re:It's ok - Raoul - 6/25/2004 7:22:18 PM
        
        Hypocrisy - REB - 6/25/2004 7:40:59 PM
        
        re: Hypocrisy - Raoul - 6/25/2004 10:31:16 PM
        
        My my - Tony - 6/25/2004 9:09:40 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (30 posts)