re: According to the worthless tabloid, the Washinton Times, nuclear weapons have been found in Iraq.

Current Events » in reply to According to the worthless tabloid, the Washinton Times, nuclear weapons have been found in Iraq.

Davin L. — 7/21/2004 7:26:24 PM (archived)

Hmmm. 2 days before the comission report there are absolutely garbage filled claims that Sandy Berger (after a lifetime of gov't service) is guilty of, essentially, high treason.

1 day before the comission report, we have a sensational story about a trio of nuclear missiles around tikrit.

Pardon me while I go grab another 20 pound bag of salt from the store.

Meanwhile, I'll be glad to let the partisan shills here dance the rain dance. Who knows. It just might rain.

Davin L.

The whole thread (21 posts)

According to the worthless tabloid, the Washinton Times, nuclear weapons have been found in Iraq. - David F Mayer - 7/21/2004 4:13:45 PM
- Might as well subscribe to the National Enquirer - Donald - 7/22/2004 12:35:11 AM
  - At least the National Enquirer is funny. The Washington Times is not even THAT. - David F Mayer - 7/22/2004 2:39:01 PM
- re: According to the worthless tabloid, the Washinton Times, nuclear weapons have been found in Iraq. - Davin L. - 7/21/2004 7:26:24 PM
  - He has admitted to mishandling and losing codeword level classified documents - Larry J - 7/21/2004 8:05:37 PM
    - re: He has admitted to mishandling and losing codeword level classified documents - Davin L. - 7/21/2004 8:35:59 PM
      - Chill the rhetoric - Larry J - 7/21/2004 9:05:30 PM
        
        Thats advice you should take to heart! - Davin L. - 7/22/2004 12:04:48 AM
- Reuters reports: "Stupid" - RobVG - 7/21/2004 5:55:58 PM
- Fun to speculate - FrankC - 7/21/2004 4:34:52 PM
  - There's a difference between newly discovered nukes and a 9mo. old investigation. - RobVG - 7/21/2004 5:00:30 PM
  - In the EXTREMELY UNLIKELY event that this news proves to be true, here are my predictions of the liberal responses: - David F Mayer - 7/21/2004 4:48:52 PM
    - Why is it EXTREMELY UNLIKELY? - Tony - 7/21/2004 7:02:12 PM
      - Because the Washington Times is careful to delete any truthful statements from its articles before publication. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 7/21/2004 7:44:15 PM
    - I think you both nailed it pretty good. ;) - Tom Brosz - 7/21/2004 5:01:13 PM
- That one goes clear past the "48-hour" rule to at least a week. - Tom Brosz - 7/21/2004 4:20:57 PM
  - You wrote: "emphasized the limits of their sources". What sources? They just make up the news. It is a mere scandal sheet owned and operated by the Moonies for their propaganda purposes. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 7/21/2004 4:32:22 PM
    - Oh, really? - Tom Brosz - 7/21/2004 4:59:42 PM
      - I prefer to use RELIABLE sources so I don't need to check on each news item. - David F Mayer - 7/21/2004 8:48:35 PM
        
        Really? - Tom Brosz - 7/21/2004 10:37:37 PM
        
        Some are better than others. The Washington Times is no more than Rev Sun Moon's propaganda rag. - David F Mayer - 7/22/2004 2:41:00 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (21 posts)