Reuters reports: "Stupid"

Current Events » in reply to According to the worthless tabloid, the Washinton Times, nuclear weapons have been found in Iraq.

RobVG — 7/21/2004 5:55:58 PM (archived)

Iraq dismisses nuclear find report
Wed 21 July, 2004 14:34

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraq's Interior Ministry has dismissed as "stupid" a report in a local newspaper that three nuclear missiles were found near the town of Tikrit.

A senior U.S. military official told reporters on Wednesday he had no information on the report in the newspaper al-Sabah. He said officials were checking the report.

Asked by Reuters about the report, a spokesman at the Interior Ministry said: "It's stupid."

(Entire story)

The whole thread (21 posts)

According to the worthless tabloid, the Washinton Times, nuclear weapons have been found in Iraq. - David F Mayer - 7/21/2004 4:13:45 PM
- Might as well subscribe to the National Enquirer - Donald - 7/22/2004 12:35:11 AM
  - At least the National Enquirer is funny. The Washington Times is not even THAT. - David F Mayer - 7/22/2004 2:39:01 PM
- re: According to the worthless tabloid, the Washinton Times, nuclear weapons have been found in Iraq. - Davin L. - 7/21/2004 7:26:24 PM
  - He has admitted to mishandling and losing codeword level classified documents - Larry J - 7/21/2004 8:05:37 PM
    - re: He has admitted to mishandling and losing codeword level classified documents - Davin L. - 7/21/2004 8:35:59 PM
      - Chill the rhetoric - Larry J - 7/21/2004 9:05:30 PM
        
        Thats advice you should take to heart! - Davin L. - 7/22/2004 12:04:48 AM
- Reuters reports: "Stupid" - RobVG - 7/21/2004 5:55:58 PM
- Fun to speculate - FrankC - 7/21/2004 4:34:52 PM
  - There's a difference between newly discovered nukes and a 9mo. old investigation. - RobVG - 7/21/2004 5:00:30 PM
  - In the EXTREMELY UNLIKELY event that this news proves to be true, here are my predictions of the liberal responses: - David F Mayer - 7/21/2004 4:48:52 PM
    - Why is it EXTREMELY UNLIKELY? - Tony - 7/21/2004 7:02:12 PM
      - Because the Washington Times is careful to delete any truthful statements from its articles before publication. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 7/21/2004 7:44:15 PM
    - I think you both nailed it pretty good. ;) - Tom Brosz - 7/21/2004 5:01:13 PM
- That one goes clear past the "48-hour" rule to at least a week. - Tom Brosz - 7/21/2004 4:20:57 PM
  - You wrote: "emphasized the limits of their sources". What sources? They just make up the news. It is a mere scandal sheet owned and operated by the Moonies for their propaganda purposes. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 7/21/2004 4:32:22 PM
    - Oh, really? - Tom Brosz - 7/21/2004 4:59:42 PM
      - I prefer to use RELIABLE sources so I don't need to check on each news item. - David F Mayer - 7/21/2004 8:48:35 PM
        
        Really? - Tom Brosz - 7/21/2004 10:37:37 PM
        
        Some are better than others. The Washington Times is no more than Rev Sun Moon's propaganda rag. - David F Mayer - 7/22/2004 2:41:00 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (21 posts)