Fun to speculate

Current Events » in reply to According to the worthless tabloid, the Washinton Times, nuclear weapons have been found in Iraq.

Fun to speculate

FrankC — 7/21/2004 4:34:52 PM (archived)

If by some chance it turned out true:

"There were only three, that hardly qualifies as a nuclear arsenal."

"Obviously left over from the early 90s and forgotten"

"These stinking little nukes had less than a megaton output. Hardly a reason to invade a country."

"So, when do we invade Israel?"

"The timing of this story sure is funny"

Feel free to add you own.

The whole thread (21 posts)

According to the worthless tabloid, the Washinton Times, nuclear weapons have been found in Iraq. - David F Mayer - 7/21/2004 4:13:45 PM
- Might as well subscribe to the National Enquirer - Donald - 7/22/2004 12:35:11 AM
  - At least the National Enquirer is funny. The Washington Times is not even THAT. - David F Mayer - 7/22/2004 2:39:01 PM
- re: According to the worthless tabloid, the Washinton Times, nuclear weapons have been found in Iraq. - Davin L. - 7/21/2004 7:26:24 PM
  - He has admitted to mishandling and losing codeword level classified documents - Larry J - 7/21/2004 8:05:37 PM
    - re: He has admitted to mishandling and losing codeword level classified documents - Davin L. - 7/21/2004 8:35:59 PM
      - Chill the rhetoric - Larry J - 7/21/2004 9:05:30 PM
        
        Thats advice you should take to heart! - Davin L. - 7/22/2004 12:04:48 AM
- Reuters reports: "Stupid" - RobVG - 7/21/2004 5:55:58 PM
- Fun to speculate - FrankC - 7/21/2004 4:34:52 PM
  - There's a difference between newly discovered nukes and a 9mo. old investigation. - RobVG - 7/21/2004 5:00:30 PM
  - In the EXTREMELY UNLIKELY event that this news proves to be true, here are my predictions of the liberal responses: - David F Mayer - 7/21/2004 4:48:52 PM
    - Why is it EXTREMELY UNLIKELY? - Tony - 7/21/2004 7:02:12 PM
      - Because the Washington Times is careful to delete any truthful statements from its articles before publication. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 7/21/2004 7:44:15 PM
    - I think you both nailed it pretty good. ;) - Tom Brosz - 7/21/2004 5:01:13 PM
- That one goes clear past the "48-hour" rule to at least a week. - Tom Brosz - 7/21/2004 4:20:57 PM
  - You wrote: "emphasized the limits of their sources". What sources? They just make up the news. It is a mere scandal sheet owned and operated by the Moonies for their propaganda purposes. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 7/21/2004 4:32:22 PM
    - Oh, really? - Tom Brosz - 7/21/2004 4:59:42 PM
      - I prefer to use RELIABLE sources so I don't need to check on each news item. - David F Mayer - 7/21/2004 8:48:35 PM
        
        Really? - Tom Brosz - 7/21/2004 10:37:37 PM
        
        Some are better than others. The Washington Times is no more than Rev Sun Moon's propaganda rag. - David F Mayer - 7/22/2004 2:41:00 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (21 posts)