Who's being obtuse now?
You know darn well what Raoul's point was.
As for........
If anything, the fact that Israel has overwhelming military superiority, and has not used it for genocide, says something important.
Nice that you have such a low bar set. "They may not be ideal, but at least they're not committing genocide."
If the situation were reversed, if Israel was fighting with hand weapons and Arafat had atomic bombs, what do you think the result would be?
Didn't you two already have this argument?
(fwiw, I completely disagreed with raoul's reasoning back then)