Do a little research (for a change) and find out how much of our budget does NOT actually end up in American pockets. Including the billions going to Iraq.
I think last time you batted it weakly back over the net by saying something along the lines of paying a doctor to treat someone is GOOD spending, while paying a worker to build an armored vehicle is BAD spending.
I'm sure everyone in America has their own opinions on what spending is good and bad.
I dare say I could find a lot of people who would call the money spent by NASA a complete waste.
And of course the bottom line, literally, is that adding trillions to the budget, on ANY spending program, is not a good thing. If Kerry or some other Democrat is successful, in fifty years Iraq's costs will be as distant a memory as the costs of the War in Korea, but hundreds of billions a year will still be feeding the bottomless maw of socialized medicine.
(Would a flattened canard be the same thing as a pressed duck?)
Current Events » in reply to Would that be spent IN America ON Americans?
I think I flattened that canard some time ago, didn't I?
The whole thread (32 posts)
- The Bush Legacy: A Record Deficit
- When a 'record' isn't a record
- BUT - It's $100 billion LESS than once projected!!!
- Yeah...I guess...everything is relative
- My America, right or wrong........
- Well yes there is the war on terrorism...
- So, let's all vote for Kerry and his trillion dollar health care program
- Yes...lets...your're finally getting it...
- So Kerry is going to stop the war on terror to save money so old people can get free healthcare?
- BTW, whenever a Democrat mentions "investing," I grab my wallet. (n/t)
- I can't believe the childlike faith liberals have in this concept.
- Would that be spent IN America ON Americans? (n/t)
- Yes...lets...your're finally getting it...
- Yeah...I guess...everything is relative
