There is a difference between spending American money providing health care for American people, men, women and children, or doing cancer research, and
spending American money to kill people who are no threat.
Spending American money for health insurance for everyone would pay American doctors, nurses, lab techs, nursing home employees creating a healthier American population instead of
spending money creating hate for America, breeding more terrorists and absolutely insuring more attacks on America than would happen otherwise.
The issue is not only THAT money is spent but on WHAT it's spent on.
A better health care system is a GOOD thing, a prison run like Abu Ghaib is a BAD thing even though both cost American money.
Seems simple. Most of us try to not spend money unless we get something of positive value to us for it.
Arf
Current Events » in reply to I think I flattened that canard some time ago, didn't I?
Only in your own mind. This is a simple issue.
The whole thread (32 posts)
- The Bush Legacy: A Record Deficit
- When a 'record' isn't a record
- BUT - It's $100 billion LESS than once projected!!!
- Yeah...I guess...everything is relative
- My America, right or wrong........
- Well yes there is the war on terrorism...
- So, let's all vote for Kerry and his trillion dollar health care program
- Yes...lets...your're finally getting it...
- So Kerry is going to stop the war on terror to save money so old people can get free healthcare?
- BTW, whenever a Democrat mentions "investing," I grab my wallet. (n/t)
- I can't believe the childlike faith liberals have in this concept.
- Would that be spent IN America ON Americans? (n/t)
- Yes...lets...your're finally getting it...
- Yeah...I guess...everything is relative
