oil prices, deficits, etc. Historical records show that simply isn't true but I hear it all the time.
If you're talking about the raw number of Americans who are working, I think you could accurately say that more are working now than at any time in history. However, a more accurate measure is the unemployment (or employment) percentage rate. That rate is a good measure regardless of any growth in population.
Has the unemployment rate been lower than it is today? Certainly, including the late 1990s. Today's rate is 5.5%, about the same (5.6%) as it was in 1996 when Clinton was running for his second term. That was considered a good rate then but is somehow considered a bad rate today. Strange.
Current Events » in reply to Is it like Republicans quoting job statistics that don't take population growth into account?
Could be, but I don't hear that nearly as often as 'record high' ...
The whole thread (21 posts)
- It just makes me so proud and happy.......
- And at the same time that tax collections are the highest in history...
- Yes..let's pick on Tom...
- By the way...
- The issue is government spending.
- Once again, a failure to adjust for inflation
- re: Once again, smoke and mirrors...Republican style... (n/t)
- My word, what a devastating counter-attack. Larry, you ok? (n/t)
- I guess simple math is too hard for Democrats like you
- Is it like Republicans quoting job statistics that don't take population growth into account? (n/t)
- re: Note to self: Republicans and their fellow traveler don't get jokes without smiles... (n/t)
- re: Note to self: Republicans and their fellow traveler don't get jokes without smiles... (n/t)
- Ignore the lame response - just a gleefully innumerate DNC sock puppet (n/t)
- re: Once again, smoke and mirrors...Republican style... (n/t)
