Let's find out a bit about this. To quote you:

"Global Warning - Bulletins from a warmer world"

Such is typical of their political leaning & timing.

Where is the political part of that statement, or view? How is it that pure science is now viewed as "political"? Does this sound like the Roman Catholic Church and Galileo, where science had to match religion?

Following,

Then as expected the anti-western, anti-American fossil fuels speech:

"It wont be easy for a world addicted to fossil fuels to limit emissions. Three years ago the United States spurned the Kyoto Protocol, citing costs."

Where is that untrue? How is it anti-western, anti-American if it accurately describes the American response? Has it come to the point where reporting what we do is considered anti-American? (The answer to that is a resounding affirmative. Conservatives think that reporting American atrocities is unAmerican.)

Anyway, I'm curious to know the basis of your prejudices. They seem to be geared to wanting to live in a fairyland, resentful of those who point out reality.

Arf