re: Any plutonium can be used in a bomb.

Current Events » in reply to Any plutonium can be used in a bomb.

Davin L. — 9/3/2004 3:43:52 PM (archived)

"Pure Pu239 is best, but the other isotopes do not make it unusable. They just make manufacture a little trickier, and the bombs larger due to increased quantity of explosive for compression."

I can't comment on this one- but I will say that at some point you may have to posit a third world country spending trillions of dollars to get and refine enough plutonium from Pebble Bed reactors to make bombs. Thats not exactly easy proliferation.

The whole thread (19 posts)

China to build pebble bed reactors? - Tom Brosz - 9/3/2004 5:46:23 AM
- Great article Tom - Art Martin - 9/3/2004 6:39:41 PM
- Interesting info on nuclear power - LJ - 9/3/2004 4:29:50 PM
- "Wouldn't it be massively ironic if, in twenty years, our nation and the world was scattered with safe, cheap nuclear reactors labeled "Made in China?" " - David F Mayer - 9/3/2004 6:05:19 AM
  - re: "Wouldn't it be massively ironic if, in twenty years, our nation and the world was scattered with safe, cheap nuclear reactors labeled "Made in China?" " - Art Martin - 9/3/2004 6:41:52 PM
  - re: "Wouldn't it be massively ironic if, in twenty years, our nation and the world was scattered with safe, cheap nuclear reactors labeled "Made in China?" " - Davin L. - 9/3/2004 6:21:16 AM
    - Good point. - Tom Brosz - 9/3/2004 3:15:46 PM
    - Breeder reactors - Gary - 9/3/2004 7:05:37 AM
      - Any plutonium can be used in a bomb. - David F Mayer - 9/3/2004 2:14:53 PM
        
        re: Any plutonium can be used in a bomb. - Davin L. - 9/3/2004 3:43:52 PM
- Nuclear power is totally worthless from an economic standpoint. - David F Mayer - 9/3/2004 6:03:32 AM
  - Suddenly now we get an allergy to subsidies? - Tom Brosz - 9/3/2004 3:17:27 PM
  - The history does not seem to support that completely. (n/t) - ebnelson - 9/3/2004 3:04:58 PM
  - Pebble bed reactors are different - Gary - 9/3/2004 7:12:19 AM
    - No they are not. All reactors can fail with possible breach of containment and loss of coolant. None is insured to reasonable levels. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 9/3/2004 2:16:36 PM
      - I am not moved unless you can cash out that claim - Davin L. - 9/3/2004 3:39:52 PM
  - That argument - Davin L. - 9/3/2004 6:18:24 AM
    - If it has not been done despite 50 years of intense effort and a trillion dollars of investment, it may not be doable. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 9/3/2004 3:02:51 PM
      - But your still arguing up the wrong tree - Davin L. - 9/3/2004 3:36:01 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (19 posts)